Talk:Adhaalath Party

Shouldnt it be (transliterated) Adhaalath party instead of (translated) Justice Party, since it is the official name recognized by the party and the maldivian authorities? Furthur more their domain name has it... so i think it should be Adhaalath Party instead of Justice Party. --Oblivious 03:16, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

The article's name should reflect the official (registered) name of the organization instead of its literal translation. See article 1 of their "basic regulations" document (in Dhivehi). --Fizan 08:33, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adhaalath Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101130215825/http://www.adhaalathparty.com:80/ to http://www.adhaalathparty.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Removing some misinformation.

The article claims that the Adhaalath Party defended the destruction of pre-Islamic artifacts housed in the National Museum in 2012 by vandals because they were "idols". This is blatantly false. The source used is unreliable and here's a better source from the New York Times on the incident: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/world/asia/political-turmoil-threatens-archaeological-treasures-in-maldives.html. Here is the relevant section I'll quote: "Officials of Adhaalath, an Islamist political party that took part in protests against the Nasheed administration, condemned the vandalism of the statues.... it said it had never objected to the presence of the statues in the museum. I'll promptly remove the inaccurate text.--SlackingViceroy (talk) 18:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)