Talk:Ace in the Hole (1951 film)/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Ace in the Hole (1951 film). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

"Ace in the Hole" - Title

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I have seen this film on TV several times since the 1960s, both in Ireland and the UK, and the title has always been "Ace in the Hole". Perhaps it is only in the USA that the title "The Big Carnival" persisted until the era of TCM.

It may not have been a box-office success, but I have always rated it among Kirk Douglas's best, second perhaps only to "Paths of Glory". 92.3.60.76 (talk) 00:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.60.76 (talk) 00:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

I went to this page to say precicely the same thing. This film was making the 16mm rental rounds as Ace in the Hole, and all the rep houses billed it as such -- in 1970s U.S. The film also had distribution as "The Big Story." The article has its chronology wrong.69.231.194.49 (talk) 15:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

I will investigate this later today for a clearer explanation. Erik (talk | contribs) 15:48, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

I've only seen the movie once easily 20-25 years ago here on Australian television and it was definitely called "The Big Carnival" it took me a while to find this article to reference due to search engines listing the unfolding Thai Cave rescue of a soccer team and their ?coach? - their rescue is thought to take four months at this early stage, hence my recalling "The Big Carnival" Timelord2067 (talk) 04:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ace in the Hole (1951 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Alternate ending?

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Following on from my previous post, was there an alternative ending filmed? I recall the reporter (Douglas) working for the local news paper at the very end of the movie after he gained a conscience after the cavers' death and blurted out the news of the death before he could call it in to New York. The tourists who'd come to see the attraction pack their bags and cars and leave. Shots of the various carnival rides abandoned (as though to reinforce the notion of it having been a Carnival) Timelord2067 (talk) 05:00, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Neither the extensive notes about the film in the AFI Catalog [1] nor the TCM article say anything about a changed ending. A Google search didn't turn up anything either. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:20, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Not a film Noir

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I'm not sure why it's described as a film noir. Noirs are mysteries, often a cat and mouse game between the lead and femme fatale. Crime is prevalent, betrayal is prevalent. Some of these elements are present in Ace in the Hole, such as the betrayal by the wife, or her presence as a femme fatale character of sorts. But the setting and main character is all wrong. Film noirs thrive on letting their leads slip further+ and further down the slope until the inevitable happens, often death. There is no mystery in this film, and Douglass isn't sucked into a dark world under the surface of what the public sees, he IS that dark world. He's not the amoral, rough around the edges detective, or insurance agent, he's a master manipulator. His arc is one of redemption, although it falls short. In my mind, the elements of mystery, seduction, crime and fate are what define the genre of noir. 23.93.127.51 (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

~~The description of the film as "noir" is sourced to an article in Slate magazine. Do you have a source which says that the film is not noir?~~ Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Actually, as the article itself points out, Eddie Muller, an authority on noir, does not consider the film to be noir. I have adjusted the lede accordingly. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

No, it's hardly noir. It's generally farcical, despite some pathos for balance. That is ironically similar to the farcical use of "lede" for the correct word "lead" meaning the leading paragraph of an article. The pathos is the sad acceptance of such a monstrous word. Cheers. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric

The only farce here is the behavior of people who act as if they know more then they actually do. "Lede" is used in the newspaper business to describe the lead paragraph, and was invented precisely to differentiate it from "lead" (pronounced "leed") and "lead" (pronounced "led"). When a newsperson uses "lede", there is no ambiguity whatsoever about what is meant. Incidentally, "irony" means "the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect", so there's absolutely no irony in the use of "lede", nor is the usage "farcical" in any way. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC)