Talk:Accordion (GUI)

Image is incorrect

From what I can tell, the example image is *not* of an accordion, but of a *tabbed* UI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.100.164 (talk) 02:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Untitled

I added the Google Reader example but I didn't add a link because Google Reader requires a Google account and anyone who has such an account is probably aware they can use it to check out Google Reader, since it is obviously a Google service.

This article needs a screenshot (I am not yet able to upload files). BoffinbraiN (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

So, uh, what is it?

From reading the article, I still don't really understand what's being talked about. I haven't looked at the examples yet, but it seems that if the article is going to stand on its own it should better describe (and maybe picture) what it's talking about. --Steven Fisher (talk) 18:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

try google google talk ;) 86.61.232.26 (talk) 14:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Dubious origin

I do not believe that this particular implementation (Moo.Fx) is the first ever to have created an accordion-like widget. The linked primary source certainly doesn't support that claim. New kinds of widgets tend to be created in academia through HCI research, and then evolve in the wild adapting to particular uses. Can we seriously assert that nobody has implemented an animated tabbed selector in Flash before, ever? Diego (talk) 10:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

I agree. There were examples of accordions before Moo.Fx and the reference is the development site rather than a trustworthy source. This reference is being used more as an advertisement. The reference should be deleted until a verifiable source of the information is available and a specific date is given. Futurerichperson (talk) 19:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Image sought

It would be nice with a sample image/picture of an accordion. It would make it much easier to see at a glance what an accordion is.

--Mortense (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Accordion (GUI). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203043904/http://hypotext.webs.com:80/slideverse.htm to http://hypotext.webs.com/slideverse.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070503050709/http://www.yourhead.com:80/accordion/index.html to http://www.yourhead.com/accordion/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008042954/http://mootools.net:80/demos/?demo=Accordion to http://mootools.net/demos/?demo=Accordion
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070524055359/http://www.monfx.com:80/journal/2006/08/01/sliding-ajax-shelf-the-code-behind-the-mask/ to http://www.monfx.com/journal/2006/08/01/sliding-ajax-shelf-the-code-behind-the-mask/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070602102134/http://www.ajaxdaddy.com:80/demo-interface-accordion.html to http://www.ajaxdaddy.com/demo-interface-accordion.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 3 October 2016 (UTC)