Talk:Accelerated Seldinger Technique

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Collegebookworm in topic Neutral Point of View

Neutral Point of View edit

This article reads like a press release or sales pamphlet in its positivity - without discussion of potential drawbacks - for the "Accelerated Seldinger Technique. Furthermore, since it endorses that only one commercially available product is available, it effectively functions as a sales pamphlet. Finally, the article's creator and overwhelming material contributor is a user (Publicoption) whose articles have largely been deleted or are based on Merge Healthcare products or services.

For these three reasons (lack of objectivity, endorsement of one commercial product, questionable source contributor), this article needs significant work to meet conformance to Wikipedia's NPOV policy. CB...(ö) 01:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Reply