 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abuse defense article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | A fact from Abuse defense appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 April 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Possible POV edit
This page certainly has some POV -- it's almost exclusively Dershowitz's views on the subject. He's a pretty bright guy and a good legal scholar, but this article is far more critical than it ought to be. I've got finals in a few weeks, so I can't fix it for a while. Patrick R (talk) 06:09, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
This page seems to me to have some POV in it - maybe a lawyer or law student could review the way it is written? -Aion 21:43, 3 Aug 2003 (UTC)
US-only edit
This article describes only the US law. Is there something similar in other countries? Lotygolas Ozols (talk) 20:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- The sources I looked at all seem to describe it only within the context of the United States. If you can find stuff about the abuse defense being used in other countries, I would encourage you to add it to the article. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 20:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- I would have done this without encouragement. However it is quite possible it is called differently elsewhere, so that google search by a layman like me is useless. (It does require a certain domein expertise even to use proper search terms.) Lotygolas Ozols (talk) 21:19, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
In the rest of anglo-law I think it's usually called battered women syndrome and the battered women's defence. Patrick R (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Defense vs excuse edit
I added a bit of hair splitting: the latter term is a synonym with a critical, even derogatory flair. Lotygolas Ozols (talk) 22:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)