Talk:Aaron Mooy/GA1

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Lee Vilenski in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 11:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

edit

Prose

edit

Lede

edit

General

edit

"Aaron Mooy, Aaron Mooy. Aaron, Aaron Mooy. He’s got no hair, but we don’t care. Aaron, Aaron Mooy"[243] - this being cited doesn't mean it is encylopedic content. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I just removed lyrics but kept the rest as well the citations JC Kotisow (talk) 21:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Review meta comments

edit
Did you have any further replies JC Kotisow? Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 21:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
No, I took your suggestions and awaiting a response for one of my questions in regards to "greatest player in recent decades." JC Kotisow (talk) 21:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Lee Vilenski sorry to bother, im not sure if you got my message or not? JC Kotisow (talk) 06:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oh, yeah that was fine. I have no issue there. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 22:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Lee Vilenski Then I have no further questions. I look forward for your review. Cheers, JC Kotisow (talk) 01:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Lee Vilenski ? JC Kotisow (talk) 05:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi JC Kotisow, did you cover the above points? Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:57, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Lee Vilenski Yes sorry, I haven't done the tag   Done but I have replied to your list saying I have completed the points you wrote. JC Kotisow (talk) 09:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.