Talk:A Star Is Born Again
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Star Is Born Again article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New edits edit
Let me see what I can do :D Thepineapplehead 11:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Title edit
Is the title “A Star Is Born Again,” “A Star Is Born-Again,” or “A Star Is Born—Again”? It appears as the second in the page title and infobox, and as the third in the body text. If the third is the title, a redirect will be needed. Felicity4711 01:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'll have to check in the Simpsons episode guide books, but it's definitely not your first variation. It's a play on "a star is born" and "born-again". Thepineapplehead 16:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:EABF08.jpg edit
Image:EABF08.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Citation Needed edit
Do we really need a source to prove that spongebob nopants is a reference to spongebob squarepants? Seems like someone is being a citation arsehole. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.19.215 (talk) 06:58, 23 September 2012 (UTC)