A fact from A House Full of Females appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 May 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is related to the Harold B. Lee Library holdings. Learn more about this collaborative project to improve coverage related to the BYU library's holdings, and how you can help here.Harold B. Lee LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/Harold B. Lee LibraryTemplate:WikiProject Harold B. Lee LibraryHarold B. Lee Library-related articles
This article is related to the 19th century Mormonism and Americana collection at the Harold B. Lee Library.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Latest comment: 11 months ago9 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that Pulitzer prize winning historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich wrote a book about Mormon polygamy using diaries from practicing polygamists? Source: A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women's Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835-1870 (intro)
ALT1: ... that a book about Mormon polygamy claims that polygamy was an early form of feminism? Source: "How the Women of the Mormon Church Came to Embrace Polygamy" Beverly Gage, New York Times, Jan 26, 2017
“A House Full of Females” is sensitive to the difficulty and confusion that accompanied early plural marriage, with its implied loss of status for women. But the book also tells a more complicated tale about women’s on-the-ground experiences. While some women objected to plural marriage, Ulrich notes, others sought it out as a means of securing economic stability or of escaping from abusive marriages. Still others came to embrace plural marriage as a form of communitarianism, in which women shared domestic burdens and labor. Ulrich describes friendships and rivalries between wives (themes that will be familiar to any viewer of HBO’s “Big Love”). She even makes a case for plural marriage as a vehicle for a form of feminist consciousness-raising. Although outsiders referred to Brigham Young’s home as his “harem,” Ulrich writes, “it could also have been described as an experiment in cooperative housekeeping and an incubator of female activism.”
New, long enough, neutral, cited, no copyvio detected. The hook is good but cites the book itself (primary citation). Hook fact is from a long quote in the article cited with a primary source. I think another hook with secondary citation would be better choise. -Nizil (talk) 07:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
QPQ not required as it is the first DYK. You can link author or other relevant topics in the hook. "Pulitzer prize winning" not needed in my opinion. Please provide another hook. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 07:41, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Nizil Hi Nizil, thanks for the review. This is my first DYK nomination, so I really appreciate your help! I just wanted to let you know that I edited my hook per your suggestions. Thanks! NatalieEmma.BYU (talk) 22:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@NatalieEmma.BYU: Thank you for new and interesting hook. Please note that when you propose new hook, strike out the old one and add new one as ALT (as above). I have accepted the new hook in good faith as the NYT article is behind paywall. Before I approve and close the DYK, please add the hook fact in article with reference. What is in the hook should be also in the article too as per rules.-Nizil (talk) 06:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
, I pass the DYK nomination. @NatalieEmma.BYU: Sorry for bit late reply. Thank you for writing this article as well as contributing to DYK. Please keep doing it. Happy editing! Regards,-Nizil (talk) 17:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
New, long enough, neutral, cited, no copyvio detected. The hook is good but cites the book itself (primary citation). Hook fact is from a long quote in the article cited with a primary source. I think another hook with secondary citation would be better choise. -Nizil (talk) 07:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
, I pass the DYK nomination. @NatalieEmma.BYU: Sorry for bit late reply. Thank you for writing this article as well as contributing to DYK. Please keep doing it. Happy editing! Regards,-Nizil (talk) 17:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)