Talk:AIR-2 Genie
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dead link
editDuring several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.museumofaviation.org/aircraftCollection/missiles_drones/04-air2a.htm
- In History of rockets on 2011-03-30 03:41:19, 404 Not Found
- In AIR-2 Genie on 2011-06-20 00:35:56, 404 Not Found
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on AIR-2 Genie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120916173103/http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/historical/1957%20-%20DNA%206006F%20-%20Shot%20DIABLO%20to%20FRANKLIN%20PRIME%20-%20Operatio.pdf to http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/historical/1957%20-%20DNA%206006F%20-%20Shot%20DIABLO%20to%20FRANKLIN%20PRIME%20-%20Operatio.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120722153558/http://www.dtra.mil:80/documents/ntpr/factsheets/Plumbbob.pdf to http://www.dtra.mil/documents/ntpr/factsheets/Plumbbob.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928181459/http://www.museumofaviation.org/aircraftCollection/missiles_drones/04-air2a.htm to http://www.museumofaviation.org/aircraftCollection/missiles_drones/04-air2a.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Nuclear-sampling Drone Variant
editI am unfortunately unable to add this information to the main article, as it is protected and I lack the proper credentials to do so. However, there is an interesting "post-script" to the Genie's career that I think deserves some coverage in its Wikipedia article. Following its retirement from use as a missile, a handful of Genies were modified into research drones for the purpose of performing aerial sampling of above-ground nuclear tests. Following their mission, the drones would deploy a parachute and be recovered in midair by a C-130 Hercules transport. At least five of these modified Genies were launched. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.135.227.26 (talk) 17:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I wasn't able to find any sources on the internet about this. If you found the information from somewhere else, you can post the name of the source here.
- Personally, I have doubts about the veracity of this information. Presumably the USAF would use existing carriers for these tests (F-89, F-101B, F-106; they wouldn't bother modifying another aircraft for this purpose), but given the high speed of these jets and the short range of the Genie (even if accounting for unpowered flight that might take it slightly beyond 10km), the carrier will probably fly through the radiation cloud anyway. And the midair recovery sounds even more like fantasy. Liu1126 (talk) 02:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- The statement by the OP doesn't seem too unreasonable to me, except the term 'drone' is probably highly misleading. The German Wikipedia claims that phased-out rocket motors of the AIR-2 have been used in high-altitude sounding rockets, namely the Astrobee. This was/is a very common procedure. Various sounding rockets have been built from all kinds of left-over solid-rocket motors. The Astrobee states some stages called Genius, not Genie, but that is already close. The capture of return capsules in mid-air, on the other hand, was also common practice, i.e. for the CORONA_(satellite) program. So the use of AIR-2 solid-rocket motors in sounding rockets that sampled fallout and capture of thir return capsules doesn't seem crazy to me. Nothing citeable though... 85.169.148.50 (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- @ except the term 'drone' is probably highly misleading
- Elsewhere on Wikipedia, I've seen the term "target drone" used for recoverable missiles of all kinds, regardless of their similarity to manned aircraft (the Temco Teal MA-31and Beechcraft Jayhawk are good examples). The Genies were converted under the ALARR (air-launched, air-recoverable rocket) program, which replaced their warheads with test instruments.
- As for citations, I read about it in the May 2020 issue of Aeroplane Monthly [1]. 135.135.227.26 (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- The statement by the OP doesn't seem too unreasonable to me, except the term 'drone' is probably highly misleading. The German Wikipedia claims that phased-out rocket motors of the AIR-2 have been used in high-altitude sounding rockets, namely the Astrobee. This was/is a very common procedure. Various sounding rockets have been built from all kinds of left-over solid-rocket motors. The Astrobee states some stages called Genius, not Genie, but that is already close. The capture of return capsules in mid-air, on the other hand, was also common practice, i.e. for the CORONA_(satellite) program. So the use of AIR-2 solid-rocket motors in sounding rockets that sampled fallout and capture of thir return capsules doesn't seem crazy to me. Nothing citeable though... 85.169.148.50 (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Location of 2024 rocket is Bellevue Washington, not Ohio
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68189568 138.128.232.71 (talk) 12:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done Observer 144 implemented the change in this edit. Liu1126 (talk) 02:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)