Talk:AD&D
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Gracefool in topic Format of disambiguation pages
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Format of disambiguation pages edit
Before a certian user reverts this page again, I'd ask that they first look I would ask that they llok at the following pages 1 and 2 to have a better understanding as to why I am constintly resetting the link for Advanced Dungeons & Dragons. Avador 06:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Having looked, these have absolutely nothing to do with MoS:DP.
- The link to "Advanced Dungeons and Dragons" is a redirect, so the direct D&D link is preferred
- There is no need what-so-ever to have a separate link to "role playing game"
- Apparently, you think I'm ignorant about this topic (implied by your "better understanding" comment). I happened to go to university at a sister mid-western school, and have the original booklets PRE-boxed set, BEFORE it was available to the general public.
- --William Allen Simpson 09:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- I do not think that you are in any way ignorent, the reason I changed the link to the redirect was because, there is a strong chance that both edditions of AD&D wikll be getting their own seperate articles, and while you are probably right about rpg link, the last edit I made did to the best of my knowledge, follow the example laid out in MoS:DP, however since you feel so strongly otherwise, and I don't want to waste my time in a childish online edit war, I will back down until I can get the AD&D pages underway. Avador 19:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'll help you with an AD&D page, but until it's made there's no point in making a double-redirect - and it is against official style. ··gracefool |☺ 20:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- I do not think that you are in any way ignorent, the reason I changed the link to the redirect was because, there is a strong chance that both edditions of AD&D wikll be getting their own seperate articles, and while you are probably right about rpg link, the last edit I made did to the best of my knowledge, follow the example laid out in MoS:DP, however since you feel so strongly otherwise, and I don't want to waste my time in a childish online edit war, I will back down until I can get the AD&D pages underway. Avador 19:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)