Talk:ABL (gene)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

why was this given a low rating? Translocation of abl is sufficient to induce leukemia... k it just seems abl is rated low because the article is not well-developed; that doesn't seem appropriate Gacggt 22:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

why do you use the term "transcript" to describe the tyrosine kinase (protein) activity? [... The bcr-abl transcript is also a tyrosine kinase, which activates mediators...]? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vardos (talkcontribs) 16:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Transcript instead of protein?

edit

why do you use the term "transcript" to describe the tyrosine kinase (protein) activity? [... The bcr-abl transcript is also a tyrosine kinase, which activates mediators...]? --Vardos (talk) 16:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


v-abl and c-abl

edit

Why is the first word about v-abl? viral abl is not the only gene under the umbrella of Abl gene (name of article) 78.133.64.179 (talk) 16:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:ABL (gene)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I think the assessment of the importance of abl as being "low" is quite inappropriate, since mutation of these gene is sufficient to induce leukemia. It is quite interesting and important. However - the quality of the actual abl article is terrible... there is barely anything written; this should not incur a low rating on the gene - it should instead indicate the article needs improvement. Gacggt 22:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Substituted at 21:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ABL (gene). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply