Talk:9th Paratroopers Assault Regiment "Col Moschin"

Military history: European / Italian / World War I / World War II / Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

original research edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

"Roughly equivalent in number, tasking and quality to the world-famous British Army SAS, the 9th.." : I have never heard this claim before and it seems excessive to me : anyone able to find some information to back this up? 91.128.113.27 (talk) 11:44, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

the 9 col moschin has done a lot of missions abroad in the last 50 years, in rwanda,lebanon,kosovo,astan,timor east iraq so on

all conducted with extreme professionality, their equipment is amongst the most advanced in the world and in costant evulution. so yes ..i think can be compared to the sas also considering that is not the spot in tv that makes a sf regiment better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.223.88.87 (talk) 12:09, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Why DUCE? Why not just Mussolini edit

"...under the orders of DUCE"

Calling Mussolini "Duce" in this context is totally wrong especially he hasn't been cited before. Since DUCE actually means commander, calling him with only this appellative, looks like an exaltation of the character.

Add topic