Talk:9tail Fox

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Kevinalewis in topic "Stub" categorisation

Untitled edit

Please correct my typos, I always fail to proofread my stuff sufficiently. Tyrhinis 22:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


I've replaced the "This article does not cite its sources" with a single "citation needed" link. It's a book, the plot summary is from the book, you can hardly cite a book as a source for its own article. The only bit which needs citing is the "described as..." 82.109.186.194 11:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

"Stub" categorisation edit

I know this might seem unduly defensive, and I thoroughly agree that this article is low importance, I'd disagree that it qualifies as a stub - from Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Assessment:

The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. - criteria for a stub

First, this article doesn't fit that very well (unless you want to argue that it's all incomprehensible?), and second, it doesn't need to be more than a stub. The article as it stands is enough; WP doesn't need much more. Calling something a stub when there's nothing that needs to be added seems, uh, a bit pointless to me... Tyrhinis 18:56, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

No problem - you could easily make this change yourself. I thought that there could be more said about any novel and this one. If you disagree, that's fine, just say so and make the change. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply