This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vancouver, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VancouverWikipedia:WikiProject VancouverTemplate:WikiProject VancouverVancouver articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is somewhat short, but says just about all that could be said about an individual cannon. And it even has a picture! LordAmeth16:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Re this: "The 21:00 firing was later established as a time signal for the general population and to allow the chronometers of ships in port to be accurately set" - the ship-chronometer thing was the WHOLE reason the gun was emplaced...the Nine O'Clock Gun was the equivalent of Greenwich as far as time in the Pacific goes, and was part of the new system of time zones established by the CPR's Van Horne (I think it was him, or one of the board guys) to coordinate global shipping. The general populatoin didn't really need a nine-oclock gun, its purpose (and cost) was entirely about shipping and vessels....I think that's in Morley's book, also most likely in Mathews' too.Skookum1 (talk)
Sounds good since you have the RS. I have emailed both Chevron and Esso to source the rock shot material. There is a Chevron station there now but the material says Esso. I was at HMCS Discovery at Deadman's Island when I first heard about it. I was told the cadet unit loaded the gun each day. It may be parks Van now but that needs sourcing to add as well. Heritage Horns has some gaps. I don't know when they got that name and emailed the relatives of Les Southwell to get a better source for his input. No response in months. I also emailed Robert Swanson's company, nil back from there as well.--Canoe1967 (talk) 03:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply