Talk:7 Wonders Museum

NPOV

The article content violates WP:UNDUE. It must portray a minority view, creationist anti-science, as a minority view. The article does not do that. A brief mention of one science organization does not express the full gravity of how WP:FRINGE this is.

As of now, the article has a baseless and unchallenged assertation about the "museum." The owners claims are false per the scientific community. The article must express that. We66er (talk) 18:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

"Scientific critics say the museum rejects any part of modern science that doesn't agree with its preconceived views, and misleads visitors by extrapolating very special geologic events into equivalence with much longer-term events.[2]" Doesn't that "express ... the owners' claims are false per the scientific community?" If you have a better idea, please suggest it. I'd like to work with you here. --GRuban (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Take the sentence you cited above: It's not worded clearly nor does it deal with the other assertations in the paragraph. IE "Scientific critics" does not equate with 99.9% of the community. Thus, my main concern, besides the first sentence, is how the science is presented. If someone came to this article without knowing about the subject of creationism or science, they would not know that "Scientific critics" is actually the scientific community and that the pastor's views are a fringe view of established scientific fact. The third paragraph, at least, needs a rewrite. We66er (talk) 18:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good, but I'm not sure what you're specifically suggesting. Change "critics" to "community"? --GRuban (talk) 19:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

OK. My changes fixed it up to NPOV standards. Science is given its weight. We66er (talk) 01:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Change of article name needed

The Title needs to be changed from 7 Wonders Museum to Mount St. Helens Creation Information Center ---OtisDixon (talk) 02:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)