Talk:4th Operations Group
Latest comment: 11 years ago by SBaker43 in topic All-jet fighter battle
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 4th Operations Group article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4th Operations Group, not 4th Fighter Group
edit- According to the Seymour Johnson AFB website, http://www.seymourjohnson.af.mil/units/, this unit is designated the 4th Operations Group. Bwmoll3 (talk) 12:44, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Changed references to current designation at 4th Ftr Gp to 4th Ops Gp. Lineagegeek (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Too Much White Space
editCan the pretty pictures of F-15s be moved so that there isn't all that white space at the start of the article? I'm here for the content, not the format, so I don't want to vandalize the article Lineagegeek (talk) 21:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
All-jet fighter battle
editEdit 00:14, 18 May 2013 by 202.189.72.37 changed:
led elements of the group into the first major all-jet fighter battle in history. The flight element downed six MiG-15s .
to
led a flight of eight sabres against 15 MiGs in the first major all-jet fighter battle in history. The flight downed six MiGs .
My concerns are:
- Eight sounds like more than one flight; "elements of the group" is an indication of multiple sub-units.
- Were these MiG-15s; if so we shouldn't lose specifity.
- Were there 15 MiGs? If so we need to keep the number.
- Can someone provide a cite for the Korean action. It's hard to determine what the reliable information is.
Thanks. SBaker43 (talk) 18:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)