Talk:4th Infantry Brigade (New Zealand)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 4th Infantry Brigade (New Zealand) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: South Pacific / World War I / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Except for one problem, this is a well-written B-class article. However, the lead paragraph mentions service in WW2 and the section on WW2 is virtually empty (Content, Structure). My recommendation is to limit the article to the WW1 unit by changing the title and removing all references to the WW2 unit. I'm sure a separate, wonderful article could be written about the exploits of the WW2 unit (North Africa, Italy). If you decide to follow my suggestions, please let me know and I will rerate the article. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The alternative would be to include the WW2 material, but I suspect that would be a lot more work. Djmaschek (talk) 22:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic