Talk:44th Missile Wing

Needs work

This page obviously needs work, but I had a photo of the patch and some basics to get started. Anyone who was stationed there under or alongside the 44th, please add. Pharmboy 21:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 44th Missile Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717203515/http://asuwlink.uwyo.edu/~jimkirk/ellsworth.html to http://asuwlink.uwyo.edu/~jimkirk/ellsworth.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Rating needs update

User:Lineagegeek That's the largest Start article I've seen! Did you check...that Start rating is actually 14 years old, when it was just two sentences [1] . Needs an update, methinks. Widefox; talk 21:06, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

You're right in that B3=yes. (And I changed that) However, B1 and B2 remain =no. If it is the largest Start you have seen, why only 6 footnotes? It would take a huge amount of work to make B1=yes. A little tweaking could make B2=yes (I'll leave that up to you), but just in the lead, the 44th Bombardment Group is not a predecessor of the wing, it is a predecessor of the 44th Fighter Group. Length does not make for accuracy or suitable referencing, at least one of which is needed for even a C rating. Lineagegeek (talk) 22:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)