This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
"and" vs "&"
editWhat is it, officially? Because this page has both "3's and 7's" and "3's & 7's". (chicken queen 19:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC))
- The single cover uses the ampersand, that seems fairly conclusive to me. FredTheDeadHead (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Style
editWould it be accurate to say it is similar to Faster Pussycat Kill Kill? I'd think that is even closer to the video, and deserves mention. -TheChrisParker (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Meaning?
editWhat does the title of the song refer to? (Not a forum post; important information article needs to address.)---SeizureDog (talk) 01:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think Josh has ever addressed it, so including heresay in the article would be a no-no. But as assumptions go, it's commonly believed the song refers to the poker hand 3's & 7's, commonly regarded as a crap, nothing hand. Would also fit with the song's theme of lies (Bluffing). Red157 14:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I am not sure how relevant this is, but I saw someone's very interesting numerological interpretation of both numbers, it seemed pretty relevant... Both numbers had interesting meanings, they seemed to fit the song... I think it might have been a combination of those factors that led to the song's name. If we can confirm this we might be able to include it. Tubularbells1993 (talk) 13:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Video
editShould it not mention there being another version of the video, which has since been removed from youtube (where the band's website linked to)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.235.92 (talk) 12:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 3's & 7's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070528083532/http://www.uncut.co.uk/news/uncut/news/9737 to http://www.uncut.co.uk/news/uncut/news/9737
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090629052348/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/radio1/chart/rocksingles.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/chart/rocksingles.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Apostrophes
editEvery use of the song title in the article does not use apostrophes - as in, "3s & 7s" - but the article title does - it's "3's & 7's". As far as I'm aware, "3s & 7s" is grammatically correct, but nearly all the official sources (e.g. the single cover) show "3's & 7's". Shouldn't the article be consistent with the title and the sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.162.208.77 (talk) 18:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)