Talk:21st Special Operations Squadron
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 21st Special Operations Squadron article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Civl War ship or the WWII oil tanker? Paul, in Saudi (talk) 11:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC))
This squadron is currently deactivated until the arrival of the CV-22's to RAF Mildenhall in the near future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.202.206 (talk) 05:55, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2013 activation edit
This page previously stated that the squadron was inactivated on 9 October 2007 (actual date was 31 October, ceremony was held earlier). It also indicated reactivation on 24 June 2013 when the CV-22 arrived. No reference for this and the editor who eliminated the post 2007 activity at Mildenhall only cited to the 2007 inactivation. However [1] indicated the first Osprey was flown in by the 7th SOS and [2] expressly states that the 7th will fly the Osprey, and the 21st will not be activated but the 7th will adopt the traditional "Knife" callsign used by the 21st.
I apologize for being a little hasty in reverting improperly referenced edits, but when I sought a reference for the squadron's June 2013 activation, I cam across the above. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 21st Special Operations Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717044014/http://thewall-usa.com/info.asp?recid=53321 to http://thewall-usa.com/info.asp?recid=53321
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226211434/http://thewall-usa.com/info.asp?recid=44849 to http://thewall-usa.com/info.asp?recid=44849
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081210124023/http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=224 to http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=224
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)