Talk:2023–24 AFC Cup

(Redirected from Talk:2023 AFC Cup)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by CX Zoom in topic Requested move 25 February 2022

Merge discussion edit

Not sure why the article was split or renamed to 2023–24 AFC Cup in early December, but now there are two articles. I think that if there is evidence from the AFC Calendars that this competition spans mutliple years it should be the 2023–24 going forward, otherwise keep it in the same yearly article naming format as before. Matilda Maniac (talk) 00:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

This section is duplicated at Talk:2023–24 AFC Cup.Matilda Maniac (talk) 00:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 25 February 2022 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Among those not wanting to delete the article, unanimous consensus exists to move due to official confirmation. Also note that article deletions are outside the scope of RMs and the usual WP:AfD process must be followed. (closed by non-admin page mover) ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 05:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


– Per AFC Qby (talk) 03:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nom, I added one related article, and this page also need histmerge. Hhkohh (talk) 05:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
    Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Hhkohh (talk) 06:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per new dates. Although why we have articles on this almost 2 years before they are occurring is beyond me... Mad WP:SPECULATION. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support as above. GiantSnowman 10:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Delete both articles entirely, under WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTAL I think there is an argument if the calendar format was staying the same, that the article should exist now - e.g. 13 months out and some teams would already have qualified, but if the whole competition is moving back 6 months to realign, then it is WP:SPECULATION that all the other elements in the article are still the same or still valid. There is currently no evidence. Matilda Maniac (talk) 23:16, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Matilda Maniac: it is better to send to AfD if the consensus is deletion. Hhkohh (talk) 09:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Let's not pre-empt the results of this conversation. Matilda Maniac (talk) 12:10, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.