Proposed merge of Youngkin coalition into 2021 Virginia gubernatorial election edit

While Youngkin coalition has a bit of sources, it's not a particularly expansive article and would fit perfectly fine in the main article on the election. TartarTorte 23:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I agree, while the term itself may be pretty common the article itself it's pretty short and can fully fit in this one, so it would be better to either add in this article at the end of all under the bigger title "Aftermath" or directly have it as "Youngkin coalition". ~~~~ SuperGion915 (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, while the Youngkin coalition is notable enough to have a number of sources. It's not a grand movement such as Trumpism to have its own article. I would place the info for the coalition after "Results" and before "Results by county and city" within the main article. ThisUserIsTaken (talk) 8:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Support. As yet, this coalition has no notoriety or relevance outside of the 2021 election. It's likely to remain that way too, given that Youngkin can't run for re-election. -A-M-B-1996- (talk) 04:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Youngkin coalitio 198.86.29.9 (talk) 12:19, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
I mean, he can run for re-election. Just not in 2025. It's four-year terms, non-consecutive. He can run again in 2029. Anyways, that in mind, Support the merge. If the same thing happens again, it can go on the future 2029 Virginia gubernatorial election page. Oath2order (talk) 12:46, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've gone ahead and carried out this merge. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply