Talk:2020 24 Hours of Le Mans Virtual/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 10:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

• It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
• It contains copyright infringements -
• It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
• It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Prose

Lede

• was an Esports 24 hour automobile endurance race - "Esports" is a proper name, but "esports" without the capital is also fine in sentence. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • I believe the current spelling of the term mentioned is fine MWright96 (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
• pit stop rotation - might need a link Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Added MWright96 (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
• I think the first para could do with a word that there are two different classification, and how many drivers per car, etc. (overview of the race) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Added more information MWright96 (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
• It was watched by an audience of 14.2 million television viewers and 8.6 million online views - where is it broadcast? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Clarified MWright96 (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

General

• I think something stating the competitors were all at home (if you can source it) would make sense, as I'm sure most racing fans might take "simulation" to mean they were all in one building. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Added mention MWright96 (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
• Is the flags in the results section normal? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Yes, in most motorsport-related articles, adding flags to represent the nationality of drivers and sometimes teams is normal practice MWright96 (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
• Everything else looks great - fantastic article! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

• I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Fine to pass. I've left minimal points to look at if you feel so inclined. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)