Talk:2019 AFC Cup group stage

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reports

Latest comment: 5 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, I think adding two reports make the page look very ugly. Why should we have a stats report and a live report? See UEFA Champions League, they only have one report for every match.--Sakiv (talk) 12:49, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Anbans 585, Hhkohh, and Flix11:--Sakiv (talk) 14:38, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Sakiv: Live reports (LR) are needed because the AFC stats report (SR) is nowhere near detailed. It does not even have minutes of goals. The examples here are from Istiklol vs Khujand. The 50', 68', and 71' are in LR while in SR here you cannot find anything of those. Since the data are composed from 2 sources, I think it is necessary. UEFA's one is very detailed and comprehensive, while in AFC I think that the LR one is far more comprehensive and informative than a static nearly-not-linked-at-all page telling you who is the team's kit man. If it is a must-do thing, I would rather dump the SR, which I think is just an abstract of the LR. – Flix11 (talk) 15:00, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I fully agree with you about removing stats reports.--Sakiv (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Stats reports are also needed because there is a chance that the live reports may decay, but the stats-report will always be there at the AFC website for future references.--Anbans 585 (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Then we can keep stats reports. The minute times is surely correct since we have added them. There is also very low chance for vandalism as the page is under our oversight.--Sakiv (talk) 17:33, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

The consensus will be implemented within three days if there is no objection.--Sakiv (talk) 16:27, 22 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Let the links be there until they decay, until then, they are a source for the viewers for checking any other info which is not mentioned in the stats.the-afc page.--Anbans 585 (talk) 20:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I can see that "live" reports contain all of the need information as goal times, referees, attendance, venue so I think it is better to remove stats reports. --Sakiv (talk) 18:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic