Talk:2017 New England by-election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: New South Wales / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal 2017 New England by-election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Missing context edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Non-Australians reading this article may be left wondering how it is that the incumbent is found ineligible yet is allowed to contest the by-election. Adding that background would give useful context. Schwede 66 14:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Done. Timeshift (talk) 15:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Superb! Schwede 66 19:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic