Talk:2016 International Champions Cup

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 201.183.100.208 in topic Melbourne si the Australia Champion 2016

Juventus didn't win

edit

Atletico Madrid and the Melbourne Victory had a match where the latter defeated the former 1-0. Since Melbourne gets three points, that puts them on top of the table, making them the victors of their group. Can someone change this? 69.122.135.223 (talk) 03:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you look at the ICC's website, which is the source used, it clearly states Juventus finished first. The match between Melbourne Victory and Atletico was simply a friendly, nothing more, not at all associated with the International Champions Cup. So unless the ICC says Melbourne Victory finished first, the article should not include the match, and should list Juventus as champions. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 04:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
And FIFA always are fair and just and never cheat!! We must remember that....--HandballHero (talk) 05:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 International Champions Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Melbourne si the Australia Champion 2016

edit

Melbourne won 1-0 at Atlético de Madrid. The champion is Melbourne, not Juventus. The standings say that Juventus played two games, and Melbourne and Atlético de Madrid will play only one. It's not logical! The sponsors and the television broadcast were like all the ICC parties, therefore, it should be considered the same. The fact that the website was not updated with that result, should not change the facts, even that website does not even exist today. --201.183.100.208 (talk) 17:14, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply