Talk:2016 Bendigo Street housing dispute

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 April 2018. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator.

	Australia portal 2016 Bendigo Street housing dispute is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Squatting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disputing the "stripping" of content by Triptothecottage edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I wish to dispute the self-described "stripping" of content in this article at 12:12, 19 April 2018 by user "Triptothecottage".

The edit appears to be based on a non-neutral representation of the content as "blatantly promotional material". Some of Triptothecottage's subsequent edits appear to be quite useful and uncontroversial, however the content deleted at the above stated time included a timeline of events, important alternate naming information, the removal of mentions of various participants such as Aboriginal people, the Homeless Persons Union, trans and gender diverse people, etc, oversimplification of locations of the dispute, relevant background information, endorsements, etc. The erasure of communities involved is of particular concern here, with Triptothecottage reducing all participants to "squatters", when it appears squatters were only one group/community involved.

I recommend this content be restored immediately. As the user "Utopic Oasis" seems to have built much of this article, any issues with providing sources could probably be resolved by messaging this user to work together to reference any unsourced claims.

I note additionally that this housing campaign was led by some of the most marginalised people in Melbourne, Victoria, some of whom are still homeless, and the content in this article was one of the few places on the internet one could find information about the housing campaign. Regardless of intention, the erasure of those communities involved and removal of content carries an inherent politics that favours the Victorian state government's position in relation to the housing campaign. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.170.239.17 (talk) 06:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi to the person who wrote the above, I checked out the edit you mentioned and I would say Triptothecottage was only removing unsourced statements, if you want to readd the chronology with references that would be great!

re the NPOV tag, added by Triptothecottage not by the person who wrote the above, well i just read the article a year later on and it seems fairly objective to me, so i took the tag off

Mujinga (talk) 19:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic