Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF second round

http://www.kbc.co.ke/news.asp?nid=76345 for Kirwa and Otogo

http://www.footy-ghana.com/national_news_detail.php?id=1754 for Diatta

http://www.lebuteur.com/en/actualites/saifi-les-locaux-doivent-redoubler-defforts-pour-etre-tout-le-temps-en-selection/print for Bakassa and Sikazwe

http://www.melekher.com/detail/football-fifa-trois-tunisiens-pour-le-match-cote-divoire-tanzania.html/#_ for Jedidi

http://www.e-s-tunis.com/EST/news/flash.php?id=8819 for Abid Charef — Preceding unsigned comment added by Normandy64 (talk • contribs) 12:24, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Saladin Said, Goals

Saladin Said has scored four goals, why does it still say he only has three goals. Please fix this as soon as possible! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.175.128.35 (talk) 10:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Referee Appointement Source (2)

http://sport-maroc.com/05/arbitre-camerounais-pour-gambie-vs-maroc/ for Alioum http://jornaldeangola.sapo.ao/16/29/arbitro_egipcio_apita_a_partida_contra_o_uganda for Grisha & Lemghaifry http://www.mfa.mu/2012/05/18/double-sollicitation-africaine-pour-nos-arbitres/ for Seechurn http://actualite-tunisie.com/national/sport/107915-cm-2014-larbitre-marocain-redouane-jiyed-pour-cap-vert-tunisie for Jiyed

Removal of next match day scenarios

Can someone please explain why someone keeps removing the next match day scenarios? They are not original research, as they are simple calculations, they are not prognostications, and numerous people find them valuable to understand the ramifications of matches. They have been a part of other Wikipedia FIFA Qualifying pages for years. I'm disturbed that someone is taking the time to destroy an active useful piece of information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.116.74.92 (talk) 00:23, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Start with this: dispute resolution of the 2012–13 UEFA Champions League group stage, for the endless discussion of the shit that is next match day scenarios, search archive on WP:FOOTY........ Dr. Vicodine (talk) 19:45, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Well, I can only say that those next match day scenarios were the main reason to why I now and then went through all the qualifying groups when a World Cup was approaching. I understand that this "Dr" for some reason disliked them, but, well, when it comes to my relationship with Wikipedia their removal made a negative impact. Fomalhaut76 (talk) 20:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

After this example I think there isn't any doubt that the scenarios is a OR and not simple math. Stigni (talk) 08:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Live scoring

Have I missed something here? Have we all of a sudden stopped doing live scoring? I've done live scoring all throughout the WCQ and never had a problem. There is even a template designed specifically for "matches in progress". Why is everybody so against live scoring? Matty1487 (talk) 15:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

For examples look here or much better here. Stigni (talk) 16:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

I appreciate you linking me to relevant discussion on the topic. However, in both of these discussions (and a third linked in the second one), there is absolutely no clear consensus and, in fact, there are only a couple users who disagree with live scoring and they seem to be tiptoeing into the realm of wikilawyering. Until there is a clear, unequivocal consensus to STOP live scoring, I see no harm in the practice, and will continue to update live scores. Matty1487 (talk) 17:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

• I support live scoring. And before the consensus on this may be changed (And that is a general discussion concerning many many articles) no one can try to impose their personal wievs on a page. That is very unwikipedian. Jack Bornholm (talk) 17:00, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Also see Template:Match in progress. Since consensus have not yet changed this template have not been erased Jack Bornholm (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

I have no been warned that I will be blocked if I dont stop editwarring. I have been live updating this page, and even though I have repeatedly asked those that doesnt agree it should be lived updated to post their arguments here, nothing have happened before I get this warning: User talk:Jack Bornholm#September 2013 Is this fair??? Jack Bornholm (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Côte d'Ivoire and not Ivory Coast !

Please be advised that the official name of "Ivory Coast" is written in French: Côte d'Ivoire, as a nation for UN and also by FIFA. Cf. FIFA website: http://www.fifa.com/associations/association=civ/index.html Thanks in advance for correcting this mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rafa1985 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 18 June 2013

Please fix the fixture-table for group H. At the moment the score in Algeria-Rwanda is 0-250, Benin-Mali 41-490 and so on. Qed237 (talk) 19:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Already done

The problem was in a template transcluded to the article, and appears to have been fixed with this edit. Thanks for pointing it out. Begoon ^talk 08:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Difficult to field eligible players for African teams?

There have already been five cases where a team fielded an ineligible player. Why do African Teams have so many problems in fielding eligible players? --Sayka41 (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/preliminaries/africa/matches/round%3D258334/match%3D300181915/report.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131016100830/http://www.cafonline.com/competition/world-cup_2014/results to http://www.cafonline.com/competition/world-cup_2014/results

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)