Talk:2013 Spengler Cup

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by European Ice Hockey task force.

The problem with team logo icons

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A user has brought up the issue of including team logos as part of the icon movement on the page. My problem with it is threefold beyond that it is included in the WP:ICON issues is that it first of all makes the page too busy, by having all the icons and colours it distracts from the pivotal information required. Second it becomes superfluous information in that the logo and team name are duplicate information indicators of themselves, whereas including the flag provides information based where that nation is from, thirdly it is best not to have too much information and to keep the page information "clean" in order to make this change we will have to go back and edit all previous editions of this tournament which is also extremely time consuming..

Using other multinational club tournament pages such as the 2013-14 UEFA Champions League, 2013 FIFA Club World Cup, or 2013-14 CONCACAF Champions League already use the flag only model. While I appreciate the hard work I don't think we should deviate from this and will revert one more time and "bookmark" the edit so that it can be undone assuming there is consensus to move forward with the new format. Let's get concrete consensus first as this takes a lot of work to construct/revert. Failure to get consensus here will mean we may have to take it to a WikiProject talk page if it becomes that big of an issue. Krazytea(talk) 22:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not a problem. I just wasn't sure if it was allowed anywhere or not. Caperspark (talk) 08:40, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2013 Spengler Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141014190146/http://www.spenglercup.ch/tl_files/images/A_OnSite2013/Dec28/IHM002T05_74_4_0.pdf to http://www.spenglercup.ch/tl_files/images/A_OnSite2013/Dec28/IHM002T05_74_4_0.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic