Talk:2011 USL Pro season
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
PRSL dropping out
editLooks like a couple people have worked on updating the results table. From what I can tell it looks like HAR, PIT, RIC, and ROC all still need to be finished. Is that correct? --Trödel 19:58, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Removing the Overall Table
editI think we should remove the overall table since there are no "wild card slots to show" and one can easily see both of the division tables at the same time. --Trödel 22:41, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. There is no need for an overall table. Also, the "wooden spoon" qualification should be removed for the last place team. This "award" does not exist. It's just made up by Wikipedia editor(s). Only official awards/qualifications should be listed. KitHutch (talk) 21:34, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2011 USL Pro season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120527224917/http://uslpro.uslsoccer.com/home/558794.html to http://uslpro.uslsoccer.com/home/558794.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)