Talk:2011–12 Northern Premier League

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2011–12 Northern Premier League article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Football: England / English non-league / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Glapwell F.C. edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Not sure why, but Glapwell are missing from the official FA list of allocations this year... Guessing they're in the same league making it a 23 team league but gonna wait til more info becomes available. Delusion23 (talk) 23:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Here's why [1] Bevo74 (talk) 23:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cheers, added to previous season's article Delusion23 (talk) 00:01, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2011–12 Northern Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.thefa.com/Leagues/NationalLeagueSystem/NewsAndFeatures/2011/~/media/Files/PDF/Leagues/NLS/NLS_Restructuring_2011-12.ashx/NLS_Restructuring_2011-12.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/attendances/northprem
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/attendances/northonenorth
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/attendances/northonesouth
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/9691664.Extra_time_Greaves_winner_puts_Bradford_Park_Avenue_in_dreamland/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091203153520/http://www.nplimages.co.uk/ to http://www.nplimages.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic