This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Is there any point in putting the "Non-Partisan" in the various tables, since it's stated at the beginning of the articles that all of the candidates were non-partisan due to the lack of political parties? Lankiveil(speak to me) 04:51, 30 September 2010 (UTC).Reply
Consistency with other election articles. It does little harm, and removing them would require making a seperate template, so it would involve some work. But I don't think the article would suffer if the "Non-Partisan" was removed. Taemyr (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
