Talk:2010 FIFA World Cup event effects

Neutrality

Is it just me or has no previous Cup been similarly picked through. I think people are just probing for problems. Surely there are a few controversies, but this really seems like a deliberate attempt to bash South Africa. I propose deletion or neutrality changes. Metallurgist (talk) 18:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

I've removed your prod. This content was in the main WC article for months with no objections raised, so having it split wholesale, and then prodded for not deserving its own article, is just wrong, full stop. As for why it exists and its bloatedness compared to other WC's, you need to remember that in 2006 Wikipedia was barely up and running, this is the first world cup where online press attention is poured into articles by thousands of people each day. It's unique existence is not hard to explain, but whether it should exist should have been debated a bit better than has happened on the main article, where it appears someone has just ignorantly gone through the article cutting and pasting entire sections into their own articles, lazily leaving 'expand' tags behind them. The main article now has about 5 whole sections which simply say, 'sod off and go and look in this article'. Beyond stupid. MickMacNee (talk) 21:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree, there is nothing wrong with showing all sides to the WC. The WC has had a huge negative impact on many South Africans. Its been documented on every major news outlet in the world. Surely thats important to present. There's also nothing non-neutral about the article. It focuses on WC controversies and therefore must present those controversies. Whether or not one agrees with that is up to the reader to decide. This article should stay and any other relevant issues should be added.72.67.215.85 (talk) 09:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

There is no neutrality dispute. At least i do not see one. The person who place it there did not provide any constructive ways to solve what he says is an issue. I for one do not think there is a problem with neutrality (and its seems most agree) and therefore I will remove it.Frombelow (talk) 06:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2010 FIFA World Cup event effects. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928224810/http://us.oneworld.net/article/362921-slums-act-will-displace-thousands-south-africa to http://us.oneworld.net/article/362921-slums-act-will-displace-thousands-south-africa
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-05-16-poohslinging-slums-act-showdown-at-con-court
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.democracynow.org/2009/10/1/south_africas_poor_targeted_by_evictions
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.sport24.co.za/Content/Rugby/264/77253aa1191947a381482cc591be690e/30-11-2009-10-31/Boks_France_Test_moved
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111006161524/http://csr-asia.com/upload/cover/307059103144.pdf to http://csr-asia.com/upload/cover/307059103144.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/more_sports/buzz_off_vuvuzelas_FPa9BYlmlRWJMsF1W65cyJ?CMP=OTC-rss&FEEDNAME=
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100616164928/http://soccernet.espn.go.com/world-cup/story/_/id/5282269/ce/us/organizers-consider-silencing-vuvuzelas&cc=5901?ver=us to http://soccernet.espn.go.com/world-cup/story/_/id/5282269/ce/us/organizers-consider-silencing-vuvuzelas&cc=5901?ver=us

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2010 FIFA World Cup event effects. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/06/14/two-somali-men-executed-for-watching-world-cup/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100626141621/http://www.sowetan.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=1147414 to http://www.sowetan.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=1147414
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090810233106/http://www.sundayherald.com/international/shinternational/display.var.2524562.0.0.php to http://www.sundayherald.com/international/shinternational/display.var.2524562.0.0.php
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C1952335%2C00.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://soccernet.espn.go.com/world-cup/story/_/id/5282269/ce/us/organizers-consider-silencing-vuvuzelas%26cc%3D5901?ver=us

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)