Talk:2009 Luxembourg general election

Misleading map

Hi, as indicated on the map's discussion page, I am afraid the "majority party per commune" map is somewhat misleading, as 1) candidates are elected by electoral district, not indiviudal communes (municipalities) and 2) they are elected by proportionality vote, not majority vote. I therefore propose to withdraw it from the article. If a map op the country were wished, it should have 4 "pie charts" (with number of elected seats per party), one for each district...

--Zinneke (talk) 09:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Luxembourgian general election, 2013 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luxembourg general election, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090612045835/http://www.wort.lu:80/wort/web/letzebuerg/artikel/26092/regierung-vorerst-weiter-im-amt.php to http://www.wort.lu/wort/web/letzebuerg/artikel/26092/regierung-vorerst-weiter-im-amt.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)