Talk:2008 Serbian local elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Serbia Mid‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Today all the necessary laws have been adopted. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 18:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pools edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

But this edit treats as if G17+ exists no more. The last is DS-G17+ opted together, since they formed a coalition. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe not the best solution, I would also like to see data for G17+. DS and G17+ are not in formal of coalition, and they have not announced that there will be a coalition on elections article is dealing with - they just have similar approach on some actual topics. In this case it would be logical to count together result of previous pools for DS and G17+, but it would not be correct, since some people who took part in the pools might had other oppinion if formal coalition exists. What you think? Jdjerich (talk) 02:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well a formal coalition does exist now. :) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, let's do something to solve this problem. What you say, should we make a new table, which will contain coalitions, as there will for sure be some more in coming days? Jdjerich (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic