Wikipedia

Talk:2008–09 Heineken Cup

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Tiering

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If anyone is wondering about the logic behind the tierings I have already put up, the spreadsheet I am using is here; basically, by looking at which teams have, have not and may have qualified one can acertain a team's potential highst and lowest seeding out of the qualifying 24, and in certain cases this range lies entirely within one tier - in which case the team must be in that teir, so I have done so. Technically OR? But verifiable. Rawling4851 14:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Irish Flag

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion

Why do Munster and Leinster not have Irish flags? Its half understandable for the national team but surely these two provinces which are entirely contained in the country of Ireland canuse the Irish flag?--194.106.137.50 (talk) 15:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Those teams do not represent the Republic of Ireland, rather they represent the Irish island as a whole. Therefore, it is not appropriate for them to be linked with the Irish flag. In fact, the only flag that they can use is the flag of the IRFU, which may not be used for decorative purposes. – PeeJay 15:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I added a new flag. This one is in the german wikipedia and is authorized for free use. - SpiderPig 14:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

That is not a flag that the Irish rugby union team plays under, and therefore it fails WP:MOSICON#Do not invent new icons. – PeeJay 14:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Listen mate. This flag is used by the german, the french, and the spanish wikipedia. The polish wiki even uses the original IRFU flag. So please explain me, why the biggest wiki version on this our planet earth isn't able to use one of them flags? - SpiderPig 18:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.75.158.206 (talk) Reply
You mean WP:MOSICON#Do not invent new icons isn't enough explanation for you? If wikis in other languages use those images, that's up to them – they have to abide by their own rules – but on en.wikipedia we have to abide by our rules, and those rules say that we should not invent new icons to fill a perceived need for one, and nor should we violate WP:FAIRUSE with regard to the IRFU flag. Happy? – PeeJay 21:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Happy is a swan in the water. I get your point of not using the original IRFU flag, 'cause it might offend some suits. But the other flag, "generic shamrock" by name, is an official wikipedia substitute for the IRFU flag. It even says so on it's page. Please take a minute and read the discussion log. - SpiderPig 01:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.75.158.206 (talk) Reply
Just because one user has, albeit eloquently, described the purpose of that image does not make it an "official wikipedia substitute for the IRFU flag". That image fails WP:MOSICON#Do not invent new icons, an issue that you have thus far failed to address. – PeeJay 23:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2008–09 Heineken Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2008–09 Heineken Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2008–09_Heineken_Cup&oldid=1196535996"