Talk:2006 Idomeneo controversy

Format and merge suggestion

This article needs an appropriate lead paragraph. The current format, beginning with a section title indicates that the Berlin 2006 cancellation was only one of of several controversies about the opera and that the article is incomplete. If it is only about the Berlin 2006 cancellations, then the material should probably be merged into Idomeneo Voceditenore (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

To be brutally frank, I think this article has more to do with religious fundamentalism or fundamentalist atheism than opera, and find it really hard to see why something so minor on a scale of - how long has it been now since Mozart wrote the opera? - 230 years needs to be included in the "main" Idomeneo article. Not that I want to put anyone off writing some more on the subject, you understand. But here, not there. Otherwise, by way of example, I think we'd have to include what Richard Strauss did to Idomeneo, and many other things as well. Thanks, Safebreaker (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060926/ap_on_en_mu/germany_opera_islam;_ylt=Ai16xpXN5nxyMD70wBLHde.s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3OTB1amhuBHNlYwNtdHM-
  • In 2006 Idomeneo controversy on 2011-05-26 02:05:21, 404 Not Found
  • In 2006 Idomeneo controversy on 2011-06-13 18:17:48, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Yep, dead-link.--81.151.154.126 (talk) 00:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

The Daily Mail link doesn't come up sensibly for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.89.132.246 (talk) 17:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Potentially Violent Muslims

I think this line in the article is distracting to people new to followers of Islam. Does the article hold all Muslims violent in whole? Please rectify this! Indusengineer (talk) 19:35, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

I think that line is a fair summary of Merkel's comment, as reported in the source. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:25, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2006 Idomeneo controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131215012812/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006%2F09%2F28%2Fstory_28-9-2006_pg4_4 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006%2F09%2F28%2Fstory_28-9-2006_pg4_4
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080103043631/http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/60DDFE0C-FB12-4212-BD70-0505EAAC14BA.htm to http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/60DDFE0C-FB12-4212-BD70-0505EAAC14BA.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:52, 17 June 2017 (UTC)