Talk:2006 Austrian legislative election

Translation request

Could someone please translate the German page onto here please?

Thank you.

--81.178.231.233 14:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm on it, but it's not easy with the text containing quite a few words without english counterparts (and with, which seems to be a case with politics, some words that haven't existed in German before the campaign either...) --Completefailure (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Gains and losses

The number of the gains and losses in the number of seats doesn't add up. Did the parliament get smaller or is this a typo? -- Deville (Talk) 06:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

They do add up, but the table could be clearer in showing that. The BZO is a new party compared to the last election, so their 8 seats are all gains. Bondegezou 11:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

I see. Does it then make sense to put a "+8" in the "+/-" column? They technically do have 8 more seats than last time. -- Deville (Talk) 05:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I'll go ahead and put it in there, then, if anyone thinks it doesn't make sense feel free to revert.--Deville (Talk) 11:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

This is extremely difficult to explain. On the one hand they have now 7 seats (they lost one) more than 2002, but they've got less than the day before the election. Man77 18:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Coalition possibilities

How is a parliamentary majority formed - through numbers of votes, or through numbers of seats? The article states that "the numbers permit no other two party coalition". Presumably this means that it is not possible for either the SPO or the OVP to form a coalition with any party except each other so as to form a majority? --Richardrj ^{talk email} 09:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Numbers of seats, of course, which correlates directly to number of votes; and yes, it does mean exactly what it says -- that the only *TWO*-party coalition with the necessary amount of votes/seats is SPÖ/ÖVP. —Nightstallion (?) 15:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Two talk pages

There seem to be two talk pages associated with this article - this one, and another one which is accessed by clicking the "discuss" link at the top of the results table. I don't think the second one should be there, but I don't know how to (or even if I should) remove it. --Richardrj ^{talk email} 09:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

That's because the results table is a separate Template - the "discuss" link there links to the Template's Discussion Page. --Completefailure (talk) 13:22, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Austrian legislative election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516054351/http://www.gruene.at/uploads/media/GruenesWahlprogramm2006_04.pdf to http://www.gruene.at/uploads/media/GruenesWahlprogramm2006_04.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.vol.at/news/om:vienna:special-nrwahl06/artikel/gastinger-tritt-aus-bzoe-aus/cn/news-20060925-04321882
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312063333/http://www.profil.at:80/index.html?/articles/0638/560/151954.shtml to http://www.profil.at/index.html?/articles/0638/560/151954.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929120157/http://www.igf.at/Documents/Presseartikel/Stimmungsklima.pdf to http://www.igf.at/Documents/Presseartikel/Stimmungsklima.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071006125858/http://www.networld.at/index.html?/articles/0633/11/148341.shtml to http://www.networld.at/index.html?/articles/0633/11/148341.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Austrian legislative election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060703033424/http://www.networld.at/channels/11/main.shtml to http://www.networld.at/channels/11/main.shtml
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.profil.at/index.html?%2Farticles%2F0638%2F560%2F151954.shtml
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.networld.at/index.html?%2Farticles%2F0633%2F11%2F148341.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)