Talk:2005 New Zealand rugby union tour of Britain and Ireland

Latest comment: 13 years ago by JeffGBot in topic Dead link

Article move

edit

Why was this article moved to a non-standard name? Can you please seek consensus before making such drastic changes. noq (talk) 12:01, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Moved back to original name. FruitMonkey (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I thought it would easier to find if the name was shorter and a bit less formal, but, i don't mind. JaFa 01 (talk) 02:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

PeeJay2K3

edit

Hey PeeJay2K3, why do you keep changing what I've done? JaFa 01 (talk) 21:42, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article content

edit

The content of this article is horribly POV, and the tone would be better suited to a magazine than an encyclopaedia. It's obviously written from a Kiwi point of view, so someone needs to go through the article and give it a massive overhaul. – PeeJay 08:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Why don't you do it? JaFa 01 (talk) 08:46, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Because I have other things that I'd much rather be doing. Honestly, I'm trying to keep track of every single article related to Manchester United F.C. I don't even have all of them on my watchlist, and I'm still swamped. Anyway, you wrote a lot of the content, so I'd say the burden should fall to you. – PeeJay 17:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't if I can, I mean, no matter how I try it will probably still come out with a Kiwi point view, so. JaFa 01 (talk) 21:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
It's really quite simple to write with a neutral point of view. You just need to report the facts, without any comment on how favourable or unfavourable any particular event was to either team. Remember, there are two teams involved in every match, so they both need to be treated with due deference. – PeeJay 22:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'll try to be as neutral as possible. JaFa 01 (talk) 23:32, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply