Talk:1960 International Meeting of Communist and Workers Parties
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editmy info write 81 parties in 1960 meeting, the list is of 80 parties, some know the last?--Francomemoria 16:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
i'm not sure but yugoslav there are in 1960 meeting--Francomemoria 16:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- No, there were no yugoslavs at the meeting. In fact the meeting harshly condemned the Yugoslav party. --Soman (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Iraq
editPassage that can be included once there is a more detailed info in the article: "The Iraqi Communist Party was represented by Bahauddin Nuri. In his speech to the conference, Nuri did praise the role of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in leading the international communist movement. But Nuri did not condemn the line of the Communist Party of China or the Party of Labour of Albania, much to the dismay of the Soviet party.[1]
References
- ^ Ismael, Tareq Y. The Rise and Fall of the Communist Party of Iraq. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 219
Sweden
edit"The Swedish delegation consisted of Hilding Hagberg (chairman), Erik Karlsson (party secretary) and Knut Olsson (editor).[1]" --Soman (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
References
- ^ Sveriges kommunistiska parti. Världsläget och de kommunistiska partiernas uppgifter. Stockholm: Sveriges kommunistiska parti, 1961. p. 4
Dead link
editDuring several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://files.osa.ceu.hu/holdings/300/8/3/text/92-4-203.shtml
- In 1960 International Meeting of Communist and Workers Parties on 2011-05-25 03:41:29, 404 Not Found
- In 1960 International Meeting of Communist and Workers Parties on 2011-06-04 18:54:31, 404 Not Found
Egypt
editEgypt appears in "red" at the map, but no egyptian party in the list (perhaps it is the difference between the 81 and the 80 that Francomemoria was talking above?).--MiguelMadeira (talk) 16:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Forget - it is in "United Arab Republic"--MiguelMadeira (talk) 16:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Anyway, the link needs to be update, the current link goes to the party founded in 1975. --Soman (talk) 17:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)