Talk:1958 Guinean constitutional referendum

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

RS for votes edit

Do we have a better source for this vote numbers? What makes this tripod site a reliable source? --生け 13:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

For a start, the African Elections Database is used as a source by the Electoral Institute for the Sustainability of Democracy in Africa, a pro-democracy NGO that sends monitors to elections in Africa. Number 57 17:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Referendum question edit

The article at French constitutional referendum, 1958 implies that the same question, "Approuvez-vous la Constitution qui vous est proposée par le Gouvernement de la République?", was asked in all the colonies as well as in metropolitan France, but this doesn't mention independence, whereas this article says that the choice was between independence and the new constitution. What exactly was asked? --Taejo|대조 21:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

As far as I'm aware, independence was not specifically on the ballot paper, but it was what would happen if the constitution was rejected. Number 57 22:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guinean constitutional referendum, 1958. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply