Talk:1953 World Professional Match-play Championship/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 18:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

• Hello Lee Vilenski, I'll be taking up the review for this article and will present it to you in some time. I hope my feedback will be helpful and that I can learn something new in the process. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 18:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for taking a look. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Lee Vilenski, I've completed the review and could not find any issues that would disqualify it from meeting the good article criteria. I have otherwise left two suggestions regarding the prose below. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 09:56, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• The first sentence in the lead could be split into two. It can sound confusing because the tournament starts in 1952.
• "who had won the World Snooker Championship as the BA&CC authorised event, and the match-play championship in 1952." This could be rephrased a bit too.

Assessment

1. Comprehension: The article is well written.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The prose is clear and concise.	Pass
(b) (MoS)	Article is compliant with the manual of style.	Pass

2. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The article has a list of references and inline citations for all lines in the body.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Sources used are reliable.	Pass
(c) (original research)	No original research found.	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No copyright violation or plagiarism found.	Pass

3. Comprehensiveness: The article is adequately comprehensive.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The article provides adequate coverage to all major aspects.	Pass
(b) (focused)	The article remains on topic without unnecessary deviations.	Pass

4. Neutrality: The article is neutral.
Pass

Notes	Result
The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view.	Pass

5. Stability: The article is stable.
Pass

Notes	Result
No ongoing edit warring, content disputes or major changes.	Pass

6. Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	Image used is tagged with its appropriate copyright status.	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Use and caption is suitable.	Pass