I hate to be the one to ask, especially seeing as the article has just been published, but this article is rather short. I'm sorry User:CycloneIsaac. You did a good job on it, and it's an interesting little storm, but isn't there any more impact? As it is, the lead is about half the length of the overall article. It's only 5.6 kb worth of info in the body of the article, which I think is a bit too short. In a way, this article is a bit like the March 1908 hurricane, which was another out of season storm of questionable structure, causing some minor impact, but in all didn't have enough info to sustain an article. Given how short the season article is, I think it would make the season article look much more complete if it had one storm that had a good amount of info, as opposed to the stubbiness for the rest of the sections (which is somewhat inevitable given some of their tracks). The season article is 3.2 kb, so adding this in would more than double it, for what it's worth. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
- Agree that the content here could serve as a nice foundation to build up the season article. It's not a pressing issue, so I wouldn't mind letting it simmer for a while to see if it can be developed further. No real objection to a merge from me, tho. – Juliancolton | Talk 17:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
