This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Being WP:Bold I merged this article with Bell Trade Act. This is not what is preferred. I would prefer two solid, informative, detailed articles, but we do not have those yet. We have two short articles that are nearly stubs. And those two articles go so well together. The Bell Trade Act required the plebiscite. Putting them together makes that connection clear, and the consequence to Philippine sovereignty. Putting the two together helps readers see what relationships was between the US and the Philippines. Separately the two almost-stubs seem blah. Merging the two also reduces the need to duplicate discussion of the specifics of the Bell Trade Act and parity and of the arguments pro and con. Hopefully sooner rather than later we will have enough material to split the article back into two.--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
