Talk:1911 Atlantic hurricane season
 | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| 1911 Atlantic hurricane season is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 28, 2011. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Featured article | ||||||||||||||||
Map inclusion edit
Map inclusion is a great idea for the pre-satellite era, like what was done with the first three storms. At least two more should be able to be added for the last couple storms, no? Thegreatdr (talk) 21:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- As I recall, for the three remaining storms the issue was either that the storm didn't come within range of the NOAA central library maps or there was simply nothing worth looking at on the surface analysis. I'll take another look, though. Juliancolton (talk) 21:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Found another source for decent surface maps. I'll upload them shortly. Thanks for the reminder/suggestion. Juliancolton (talk) 21:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Inconsistency can plague GAN/FAC candidates. Best to nip it in the bud early. At least for an article this old, there shouldn't be copyright restrictions on images included. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Understood. I got the maps for #s 4 and 5, but for TS 6 the most impressive map available consists of one broadly closed isobar. Would you say it's worth adding? Juliancolton (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- For consistency sake, yeah. It was a relatively weak tropical storm, so it's not going to look impressive. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Understood. I got the maps for #s 4 and 5, but for TS 6 the most impressive map available consists of one broadly closed isobar. Would you say it's worth adding? Juliancolton (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Inconsistency can plague GAN/FAC candidates. Best to nip it in the bud early. At least for an article this old, there shouldn't be copyright restrictions on images included. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Found another source for decent surface maps. I'll upload them shortly. Thanks for the reminder/suggestion. Juliancolton (talk) 21:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1911 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604063810/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/metadata_master.html to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/metadata_master.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)