Talk:1907 Queensland state election

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

1904 figures: 60459 (74.17%) total of which 484 (0.80%) are informal (ignore elections.uwa for this one), all other figures correct.

104,015 electors were enrolled to vote at the election, but 18 seats (25% of the total) were uncontested—11 Labor seats representing 13,579 enrolled voters, five Kidston seats representing 7,501 voters, and two Conservative seats representing 1,669 voters.

Percentages..? edit

Why don't the percentages in the results table match the infobox? Timeshift (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Good pickup - seems an IP troll messed with the figures in March 2012. Orderinchaos 06:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queensland state election, 1907. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply