Talk:153rd Cavalry Regiment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 153rd Cavalry Regiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Troop B, 1-153 Cavalry page were merged into 153rd Cavalry Regiment on 21:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC). For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
First Squadron or 153rd Cavalry edit
It is unclear in the lead paragraph whether this article is about the 153rd Cavalry or the First Squadron of the 153rd Cavalry. Please start the article with the name of the subject in boldface to clarify. Do not start the article with the name of a subsidiary unit. Folklore1 (talk) 20:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 153rd Cavalry Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121021063342/https://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/lineages/branches/cav/153cvrg.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/lineages/branches/cav/153cvrg.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Merger proposal edit
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to Merge AmericanAir88 (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
@Molestash: I have completed your request. Please fill this section out with a description of why you wish to merge the article. AmericanAir88 (talk) 16:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Single troops are not notable enough for a stand alone article. History of both 153rd Cavalry Regiment and Troop B, 1-153 Cavalry will be similar and both can be better covered together. --Molestash (talk) 17:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge I agree, to increase notability, a merger is necessary. AmericanAir88 (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge Agree, troop and company-level sub-units are below the threshold set at WP:MILUNIT. There are exceptions, but this won't be one of them. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:01, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Merge Agree. This unit is not particularly notable, and appears to contain much original research that is not repeatable. 82redleg (talk) 19:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)