Talk:12:01 P.M.
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Colombia Pictures edit
Why does this article say that Columbia Pictures was outraged? The cited article (written by Lupoff) states precisely the opposite, that *he* was outraged at the movie producers. Reefdog (talk) 19:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Short story edit
Since the "Short story" section currently has no content, I started by searching what issue the December 1973 version of the magazine was. It is issue 271.[1] Also, this board (registering here) would be a good place to find someone who has a copy of that old issue. --82.171.70.54 (talk) 23:09, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 21 January 2021 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) —Nnadigoodluck███ 22:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
12:01 PM → 12:01 P.M. – in order to match the article itself 96.244.220.178 (talk) 13:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). No such user (talk) 15:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Procedurally converted to RM. While punctuated form is indeed used in the article, many sources do not punctuate, and neither does 12:01 PM (1993 film). No such user (talk) 15:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Support as the actual short story title includes the punctuation. This can be seen in the bibliography of the original publisher, in reliable sources that mention the story, and in republishings. This article is about the short story, and not the film, so the two works could very well use different title stylizations. -2pou (talk) 18:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)