Talk:10th Parliament of Elizabeth I
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
End of the 10th Parliament section
editI think the aftermath of the 10th Parliament is really interesting!. Though the "End of the 10th Parliament” section could benefit from some more information and sentence reconfiguration. Also, what does “MPs” stand for? Vcgmu (talk) 03:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback! To answer your question, MP stands of Member of Parliament. Thathistorystudent (talk) 18:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Parliament's involvement in the War
editWas Parliament involved in the war with Spain in any major way? Did they support Elizabeth in it by providing funds or were they reluctant to provide aid? Some info on this would improve the article and that section. ZGMU (talk) 01:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
End of the 10th Parliament
editI agree that this section would benefit from more information. For example, adding some more information about the key take aways from the speech. Smh24 (talk) 17:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Small Edit
edit"Didn’t end until three years after the 10th parliament of Elizabeth I"
I believe that the p in parliament here should be capitalized and the sentence does not end with a period. I also wonder if the sentence is placed here by accident as it seems to not make total sense where it is. RBMBH (talk) 20:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
End of 1oth Parliament
editHow was the Golden speech Received ? Was she loved or hated for it . Knowing this this was her final speech I am curious how her subjects felt toward her TeddyRooFan1! (talk) 23:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- The speech took many by shock because it was anticipated that she would discuss the rising economic problems in the country. After the shock subsided her speech was well received among the members and the country. Thathistorystudent (talk) 19:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Elizabethan Monopolies
editI think that parliament abolishing monopolies is really interesting,given the fact the paten was created to help not cause more issues. This especially with the fact this only shows us that monopolies and obsessive business-like behavior date back to so long ago. How was this abolishment received by the parties that were committing the acts? I assume it was negative due to greed. But I am also curious. I think elaborating on that briefly if you can find anything would be beneficial! Historianmummy (talk) 05:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)