This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .338 Federal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily page views
|
Untitled
edit- I have requested permission from Gun Blast to use an image they have of the .338 Federal. If permission is granted, I will upload their image. Kartano (talk) 04:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image permission was obtained, have uploaded the image and forwarded permission to Wiki. Kartano (talk) 05:03, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Untitled
editVelocity given for 180 gr bullet in 308 is at least 100fps too high! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lance may (talk • contribs) 03:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Velocity for .308 updated to 2600 fps as per factory loads, despite much better performance with handloads. --CaboverPete (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Untitled
editPhotograph is not labeled, and from the neck angles, they look to be 3 different rounds.Fremry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.191.41 (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Photograph now labeled, identifying each cartridge individually. --CaboverPete (talk) 20:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Accuballs?
editSo the table that compares ballistic performance between the 338 federal and the 358 Winchester has a bullet listed as “accuballs”. I don’t know if this was a spellcheck error or on purpose, I know of no bullet named “accuballs”. I do know of a bullet by Nosler called an accubond. Help me out here and correct this if it’s wrong.
I don’t know how to correct a table. Anthonyjoehaynes (talk) 06:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)